Tissue Engineering:

The University of Ghent in vitro experience.

 

Guido Van Nooten

Hartcentrum, Ghent University Hospital

 

In general terms, tissue engineering can be described as the development of viable tissue by seeding living cells onto substrates that serve as scaffolds or matrices in order to develop living constructs or tissues which are either totally new or are representative of their naturally occurring counterparts. In the Department of Cardiac Surgery at the University Hospital Ghent, tissue engineering research is focused on the application of tissue engineering techniques in the development of a tissue engineered aortic heart valve. The in vitro research comprises four main areas:

        I.      Selection and development of suitable scaffolds.

     II.      Selection and characterization of appropriate cell types for tissue valve engineering.

   III.      Cell seeding.

  IV.      Evaluation of tissue viability.

 

I.  Selection and development of suitable scaffolds.

I.1 Scaffold Selection

At present, scaffolds used in tissue valve engineering include biological matrices created from porcine aortic valves, synthetic matrices manufactured from biodegradable polymers such as polyglycolic acid and the less developed hybrid matrices which use polymers embedded into biological matrices. Potential scaffolds tissue from both are evaluated before and after conversion into acellular matrices for specific properties required of the aortic valve and for their biocompatibility (‘cell friendliness’). In our current work, we use biological matrices derived from porcine and kangaroo aortic valves. 

 

I.2 Scaffold Preparation

At present biological valves are decellularized using a Modified Detergent/Enzymatic treatment. Essentially tissues are subjected to alternating hypotonic and hypertonic treatment to rupture cells before enzymatic digestion of cellular debris and agitated extraction (gentle shaking during 24 hours). Matrices prepared are evaluated for comparative purposes using the methodology employed to assess the fresh tissue. Matrices are further tested for potential toxicity to cells by evaluating cell survival using matrices prepared by our protocol as substrates for cell expansion. For practical purposes, in order to ensure a readily available supply of matrices of various sizes on short notice for eventual clinical application, we have investigated the feasibility of matrix preservation by cryopreservation.

 

I.3 Scaffold Evaluation

Biological valves as potential scaffolds are evaluated on:

(a)    Morphology, Histology and Ultrastructure

The normal aortic valve leaflet is comprised of structural (collagen mainly collagen Type II, elastin and proteoglycans) and cellular (valvular myofibroblasts and endothelial cells) elements. Myofibroblasts are mainly found in the spongiosa while endothelial cells line the surface of the leaflet. Classic methods such as light microscopy (LM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and polarised light microscopy (PLM) are used.

(b)    Tissue Biochemistry

To ensure adequate preservation of the extra-cellular matrix after processing of tissue to produce a-cellular scaffolds, total collagen and proteoglycan content are estimated by quantitative determination of hydroxyproline and total uronic acid in fresh tissue.

(c)    Calcification Potential

Calcific deterioration is a major cause of failure of both native aortic valves and currently available bioprosthetic heart valves. Biological tissues that are potential sources of scaffolds are evaluated for their calcification potential for comparative purposes with current bioprosthetic valves and tissue engineered valves [1]. In keeping with the literature, tissues are evaluated using the rat subcutaneous model to obtain as an initial indication of calcification potential. Calcific deposits are identified histologically by Von Kossa silver stain and determined quantitatively by Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectrometry.

 

These studies have shown that kangaroo and porcine valves differ in the proportional thickness of the layers of the leaflet, despite having the same basic histological components, namely collagen, elastin, proteoglycans and fibroblastic cells.

 

II. Selection and characterization of appropriate cell types.

Heart valve fibroblasts are comprised of a heterogeneous population of mesenchymal cells of which the major phenotype is that of myofibroblast.  Our initial experiments evaluated both adult bone marrow stem cells and mesenchymal cell lines. Bone marrow stem cells as isolated by Prockop could not be satisfactorily expanded under conditions available to us [2]. This, in addition to the unpredictability of stem cell differentiation and recent reports of unsuccessful use of stem cells in tissue valve engineering has resulted in a temporary suspension of our efforts using Prockop cells. Our current work uses mesenchymal cell lines and endothelial cells. Four mesenchymal cell types have been isolated and characterised for application:

(a)    Human arterial mesenchymal cells (pulmonary artery)

(b)    Human Dermal Fibroblasts (neonatal foreskin)

(c)    Sheep Arterial Mesenchymal Cells (sheep carotid artery)

(d)    Sheep Dermal Fibroblasts.

Cells are isolated from fresh tissue onto a plastic substrate and expanded in vitro under appropriate conditions. Early passage cells were characterised and frozen for future use. Mesenchymal cell used by us are classified as either fibroblastic (< 50% myofibroblasts) after being scored morphologically, immunohistochemically and metabolically. Morphologically we classify myofibroblasts as spindle shaped cells with well-developed cell stroma and prominent stress fibers. Immunohistochemically cell populations are characterised by molecular markers using antibodies to vimentin (intermediate filament present in mesenchymal cells), cytokeratin (intermediate filament mostly found in epithelial cells), prolyl 4-hydroxylase (enzyme required for hydroxyproline production in collagen synthesis) and smooth muscle alpha actin (a SMA, the determinant characteristic of myofibroblasts, which is an isoform of actin and found mainly in smooth muscle cells and which is responsible for contraction and force generation in myfibroblasts). The metabolic and functional properties of cells are evaluated by measuring the expression of extra-cellular proteins (collagen type I, the adhesion molecule Tenacin-C and the pro-migratory molecule N-Cadherin). Isolated human and sheep dermal and arterial mesenchymal cell populations were found to comprise at best 50% myofibroblasts. To increase myofibroblast count for cell seeding, we have investigated the transdifferentiation of fibroblastic cell populations with the cytokine transforming growth factor-b1 (TGF-b1). Transforming growth factor successfully transdifferentiates both human and sheep fibroblasts to metabolically active and functional myofibroblasts and allows us to produce large quantities of myofibroblasts for cell seeding [3].

Heart valve leaflets are covered by a mono-layer of endothelial cells. These cells express platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecules (PCAM-1), vascular adhesion molecules (VCAM-1) and human lymfocyte antigen (HLA11). Each of these molecules can interact with T-lymfocytes and are responsible for the immunogenicity of heart valves. In addition, endothelial cells have been suggested as a possible source of valvular myofibroblasts. Cells are expanded and sewn onto biological matrices in an initial step to valve seeding.

 

III. Cell Seeding 

It has been well established that fibroblasts respond to stress by developing stress fibers and thus transdifferentiating to myofibroblasts. Such stresses are present in heart valve leaflets and it has been suggested that they may play a role in both the formation of myofibroblasts and the orientation of these cells in heart valve leaflets. Such orientation is important in the orientation of newly produced collagen fibers in valvular leaflets. Matrices are seeded (4x106 cells /cm²) under, (a) static conditions; in supplemented or un-supplemented culture medium and under (b) dynamic conditions; in a custom developed bioreactor that allows seeding under specified flow and pressure and temperature conditions representative of in vivo dynamic conditions. Successful cell seeding requires proliferation, differentiation and invasion of cells into the scaffolds. These processes are dependent on both cell-cell and cell-molecule interactions. Growth factors either produced by the cells themselves or exogenously added affect proliferation, differentiation and invasion by binding as ligands onto enzyme linked receptors (serine/threonine and thyrosine receptors) with consequent downstream effects. It is our aim to establish a functional populated heart valve matrix by seeding human dermal mesenchymal cells (hDMC) on a decellularized porcine heart valve matrix.  Under in vitro conditions, we treat the fibroblasts with combinations of growth factors to stimulate them to proliferate, to invade and to transdifferentiate into contractile myofibroblasts. We have shown previously that TGF-b stimulates transdifferentiation of fibroblasts into a-SMA positive myofibroblasts. However TGF-b, as such, is unsuitable for effective population of a heart valve matrix since it dose-dependently inhibits growth of dermal fibroblasts as evidenced by nuclear Ki67 (protein involved in cell proliferation) staining, mitochondrial dehydrogenase assay (MTT-test) assay and cell counting. We have focused our efforts on finding a growth factor combination that maintains TGF-b induced transdifferentiation but overcomes TGF-b induced growth inhibition.  We combined TGF-b with several growth factors such as IGF-I, IGF-II, EGF, bFGF, PDGF-A, PDGF-B, PDGF-AB, since reversed transscriptive polyclonal chain reaction (RT-PCR) revealed that the respective growth factor receptors were expressed in hDMC cells.  Nuclear Ki67 staining, MTT assay and cell counting showed us that only EGF and bFGF were capable to overcome TGF-b induced growth inhibition.  However bFGF but not EGF inhibited TGF-b induced a-SMA expression as evidenced by immunocytochemistry and Western blotting. 


 

IV. Tissue Viability and Cellular Invasion

Tissue viability is tested by:

(i)                  characterisation of cells by morphology and histochemistry as described above,

(ii)                evaluation cell proliferative activity using the MTT assay and Ki67 staining

(iii)               evaluation of metabolism by collagen production.

Cell invasion is evaluated microscopically (LM, TEM and Confocal EM). Tissue surface is evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

 

 

References

1. Van Nooten G. Artificiële hartkleppen: state of the art. Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2003;65(3):135-80.

2. Colter DC, Sekiya I, Prockop DJ. Identification of a subpopulation of rapidly self-renewing and multipotential adult stem cells in colonies of human marrow stromal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 3;98(14):7841-5.

3. Narine K, DeWever O, Cathenis K, Mareel M, Van Belleghem Y, Van Nooten G. Transforming growth factor-beta-induced transition of fibroblasts: a model formyofibroblast procurement in tissue valve engineering. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004 Mar;13(2):281-9; discussion 289.

 

 

 

Legend Figure1.

TGF-b transdifferentation of human arterial mesenchymel cells (HAMC).

a.       Vimentin content in untreated cells

b.       Vimentin content in TGF-b treated cells

c.       a-SMA content in untreated cells

d.       a-SMA content in TGF-b treated cells

 

<terug>